<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>LawServer Forums Tag: service animal</title>
<link>http://www.lawserver.com/forums/</link>
<description>LawServer Forums Tag: service animal</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:26:09 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>steve on "Service animals are not just for visual disabilities"</title>
<link>http://www.lawserver.com/forums/topic/service-animals-are-not-just-for-visual-disabilities#post-115</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">115@http://www.lawserver.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I received some good feedback on a news item about a landlord sued by the federal government for not allowing a tenant to use a service animal in a &#34;no dogs&#34; residence.  I thought I would share it here:&#60;br /&#62;
&#34;Service animals, and under the Federal [Fair] Housing Act, emotional support animals, may be used for a wide variety of disabilities, not simply vision impairment. The landlord should be ready to pay out big damages since a similar case in Michigan resulted in $300k in punitive damages. See Grad v. Royaloak Apts,&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.bridges4kids.org/articles/2005/3-05/Freep2-23-05.html&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.bridges4kids.org/articles/2005/3-05/Freep2-23-05.html&#60;/a&#62;.  Service animals are not limited to the dog species.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The original news story is here: &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.lawserver.com/law/news/landlords-refusal-to-allow-companion-dog-spurs-federal-suit&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.lawserver.com/law/news/landlords-refusal-to-allow-companion-dog-spurs-federal-suit&#60;/a&#62;.  Thanks for the feedback.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
