Home  > For Everyone  > Transportation  > Driving While Intoxicated  > Supreme Court Rules DUI Crash Victim is Not an Accomplice 

Supreme Court Rules DUI Crash Victim is Not an Accomplice

Written by Jamie Simpson, LawServer Attorney-Editor   
Last Updated February 25, 2009

Washington's Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, has upheld a Court of Appeals ruling that state law prevents a victim of a drunk-driving accident from being charged as an accomplice in the case of a sole survivor in a fatal drunk driving crash, according to the AP. Teresa Hedlund was severely injured in an accident that killed six other people, and was videotaping the driver's reckless behavior immediately prior.

The video depicts a lone sober passenger pleading with the driver to stop driving dangerously, just before the vehicle crashed into an Auburn freeway support pillar in 2001. Because Hedlund is considered a victim of the crime of DUI, the Court held that she could not be prosecuted as an accomplice. Hedlund was convicted in 2003 as an accomplice and for furnishing alcohol and tobacco to minors; charges which were also reversed by the Supreme Court.

Comments (0)add comment

Post a comment or question below.
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Email  Email Print  Print   Digg

Stafford and Herrick, Attorneys at Law
Virgina Beach, VA Bankruptcy and DUI Lawyers

281 Independence Boulevard Pembroke One Suite 224
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462
Practice Areas: Driving While Intoxicated
www.staffordandherrick.com/
monotone-frail