Current as of: 2010 (a) In a case not covered by the priority rules in Title 9 of this article or the rules stated in subsection (c) of this section, an action based on an adverse claim to a financial asset or security entitlement, whether framed in conversion, replevin, constructive trust, equitable lien, or other theory, may not be asserted against a person who purchases a security entitlement, or an interest in a security entitlement, from an entitlement holder if the purchaser gives value, does not have notice of the adverse claim, and obtains control.(b) If an adverse claim could not have been asserted against an entitlement holder under § 8-502 of this subtitle, the adverse claim cannot be asserted against a person who purchases a security entitlement, or an interest in a security entitlement, from the entitlement holder. (c) (1) In a case not covered by the priority rules in Title 9 of this article, a purchaser for value of a security entitlement, or an interest in a security entitlement, who obtains control has priority over a purchaser of a security entitlement, or an interest in a security entitlement, who does not obtain control. (2) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) of this section, purchasers who have control rank according to priority in time of: (i) The purchaser’s becoming the person for whom the securities account, in which the security entitlement is carried, is maintained, if the purchaser obtained control under § 8-106(d)(1); (ii) The securities intermediary’s agreement to comply with the purchaser’s entitlement orders with respect to security entitlements carried or to be carried in the securities account in which the security entitlement is carried, if the purchaser obtained control under § 8-106(d)(2); or (iii) If the purchaser obtained control through another person under § 8-106(d)(3), the time on which priority would be based under this subsection if the other person were the secured party. (d) A securities intermediary as purchaser has priority over a conflicting purchaser who has control unless otherwise agreed by the securities intermediary. Prev | Next________________________________________________________________________
Questions & Answers: Business Law The lenders broker locked in my rate without telling me. I have not signed nor do I intend to sign this lock in agreement. Am I obligated to accept this interest rate, the current ... | | If a company refuses a refund on grounds that their refund policy does not apply to Category Y (when based on federal law the product is in Category A), is that a deceptive practic... | | Margot,
Whatever the federal law is that you refer to, I would guess it probably does not apply to store refund policies but to some other context. So just because there is a fede... | | Thank you for your reply. The question is over "cosmeceutical," a term not recognized by the FDA, but in any case, even in common parlance, the item in question is not a cosmetic,... | | Does 1641 statute apply to property claims adjusters?... | | I bought two year online education program. during the warranty period, the exam subjects were changed. then I can't use my paperbook and I am not satisfied with the unchanged prog... |
See also:
 |
Email
Print