Home  > For Everyone  > Government  > [More Government Topics]  > Subdivisions of the State  > Municipalities  > Washington Code 35.23.835 - Code city retaining former second-class city plan -- Oath and bond of officers 
Search the Revised Code of Washington

Washington Code 35.23.835 - Code city retaining former second-class city plan -- Oath and bond of officers

Washington Code > Title 35 > Chapter 35.23 > § 35.23.835 - Code city retaining former second-class city plan -- Oath and bond of officers


Current as of: 2009

Before entering upon official duties and within ten days after receiving notice of being elected or appointed to city office, every officer of a city initially classified as a second-class city prior to January 1, 1993, that retained its second-class city plan of government when the city reorganized as a noncharter code city shall qualify by taking the oath of office and by filing such bond duly approved as may be required. The oath of office shall be filed with the county auditor. If no notice of election or appointment was received, the officer must qualify on or before the date fixed for the assumption of the duties of the office. The city council shall fix the amount of all official bonds and may designate what officers shall be required to give bonds in addition to those required to do so by statute.

     All official bonds shall be approved by the city council and when so approved shall be filed with the city clerk except the city clerk's which shall be filed with the mayor. No city officer shall be eligible as a surety upon any bond running to the city as obligee.

     The city council may require a new or additional bond of any officer whenever it deems it expedient.

[1994 c 81 § 31; 1987 c 3 § 8; 1986 c 167 § 17; 1965 c 7 § 35.23.190. Prior: (i) 1907 c 241 § 10, part; 1890 p 145 § 29; RRS § 9015, part. (ii) 1907 c 241 § 11; 1890 p 145 § 29; RRS § 9016. Formerly RCW 35.23.190.]

Notes:

Severability -- 1987 c 3: See note following RCW 3.70.010.

     Severability -- 1986 c 167: See note following RCW 29A.04.049.

Prev | Next

________________________________________________________________________

Questions & Answers: Municipalities

is there anything that specifically bans separate prime contractors from coordinating there work between them when it comes to equipment substitutions or coordination drawings to d...
Is a rural fire agency composed of 4-5 townships under a 28E agreement to provide township fire protection (Iowa Code 359.42) determined to be a municipal non-profit organization a...
when a cemetery is owned by a township and the trustees wish to improve the roadway leading to the burial site using donated non-public funds what is the legal process?...
Are all provisions of a town's UDO enforcable within the town's ETJ zone?...
Can a rural public improvement district acquire real estate to establish and operate a campground in an attempt to improve said real estate and to bolster general fund from daily r...
in louisiana when can a person refuse medical treatment? ...
Comments (0)add comment

Post a comment or question below.
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Email  Email Print  Print   Digg

monotone-frail