jony LawServer - Laws, Legal Information & Lawyers

Print

Minnesota Statutes 176.001 - Intent of the Legislature

 

Minnesota Statutes > Labor, Industry > Chapter 176 > Intent > § 176.001. Intent of the Legislature


Current as of: 2010
Check for updates
2009 version

It is the intent of the legislature that chapter 176 be interpreted so as to assure the quick and efficient delivery of indemnity and medical benefits to injured workers at a reasonable cost to the employers who are subject to the provisions of this chapter. It is the specific intent of the legislature that workers' compensation cases shall be decided on their merits and that the common law rule of "liberal construction" based on the supposed "remedial" basis of workers' compensation legislation shall not apply in such cases. The workers' compensation system in Minnesota is based on a mutual renunciation of common law rights and defenses by employers and employees alike. Employees' rights to sue for damages over and above medical and health care benefits and wage loss benefits are to a certain degree limited by the provisions of this chapter, and employers' rights to raise common law defenses such as lack of negligence, contributory negligence on the part of the employee, and others, are curtailed as well. Accordingly, the legislature hereby declares that the workers' compensation laws are not remedial in any sense and are not to be given a broad liberal construction in favor of the claimant or employee on the one hand, nor are the rights and interests of the employer to be favored over those of the employee on the other hand.

History:

1981 c 346 s 52; 1983 c 290 s 25

previous section Table of Contentsnext section
Previous section Table of ContentsNext section

________________________________________________________________________

Questions & Answers: Workers Compensation

I had a 3.5% permanent partial impairment from on the job back in 1992. My Jod created a nioce office job inspectiong. However, throughtout those years i've been having problems wi...
i had a severe hand injury. i now have no use of that hand. fingers were severed ( 1 amputated, 2 fused, and severe joint damaged) would that be the same as loss of limb...loss of...
What is the weeks paid on a back and or neck injury ? How about acupuncture? Thanks...
when do get your big settlement after having sugery...
I was injured in Ct. the year 2000 I have received only one cost of living raise 7 years ago. What is the law...
I have a total of around 10 hours searching for answer to that question. I was operated on bout the 5th of Jan. All forms are filled out and returned on my end as of 3/29-30. Haven...

Minnesota Laws: Workers Compensation

Minnesota Statutes Chapter 175A - Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 176 - Workers' Compensation

Federal Regulations: Workers Compensation

CFR > Title 20 > Chapter VI > Part 722 - Criteria for determining whether State workmen's compensation laws provide adequate coverage for pneumoconiosis and listing of approved State laws

Related Articles: Workers Compensation

 Texas Supreme Court Workers' Compensation Decision Sparks Controversy
 Workers’ Compensation Overview
 

LawServer is for purposes of information only and is no substitute for legal advice.
© 2013 LawServer, Inc. All rights reserved