Arizona Laws 17-605. Noise pollution; nuisance; defense; costs
Current as of: 2023 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
A. It is an affirmative defense to any civil liability or claim for equitable relief arising from any allegation regarding noise or noise pollution that results from owning, operating or using an outdoor shooting range if the entity or individual owning, operating or using the range complies with this article.
Terms Used In Arizona Laws 17-605
- Action: includes any matter or proceeding in a court, civil or criminal. See Arizona Laws 1-215
- Allegation: something that someone says happened.
- Equitable: Pertaining to civil suits in "equity" rather than in "law." In English legal history, the courts of "law" could order the payment of damages and could afford no other remedy. See damages. A separate court of "equity" could order someone to do something or to cease to do something. See, e.g., injunction. In American jurisprudence, the federal courts have both legal and equitable power, but the distinction is still an important one. For example, a trial by jury is normally available in "law" cases but not in "equity" cases. Source: U.S. Courts
- including: means not limited to and is not a term of exclusion. See Arizona Laws 1-215
- range: means a permanently located and improved area that is designed and operated for the use of rifles, shotguns, pistols, silhouettes, skeet, trap, black powder or any other similar sport shooting in an outdoor environment. See Arizona Laws 17-601
B. In any action where a defense has been raised pursuant to subsection A, the court shall award the prevailing party its costs and all expenses, including the party’s costs incurred in measuring noise emitted from the range and reasonable attorney fees.