(a) The Commissioner of Agriculture or the commissioner’s duly authorized agent may seize, destroy, dispose of or embargo any milk, milk product or cheese that does not comply with the provisions of this chapter, chapter 431 or regulations adopted hereunder or pursuant to chapter 431 and is deemed to be unfit or unsafe for use as a food or is a threat to public health.

Terms Used In Connecticut General Statutes 22-129a

  • Adulterated: means any milk, milk product, retail raw milk or cheese: (A) Which bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health, provided if the substance is not an added substance, such milk, milk product, retail raw milk or cheese shall not be considered adulterated if the quantity of such substance in such milk, milk product, retail raw milk or cheese would not ordinarily render it injurious to health, (B) which bears or contains any added poisonous or added deleterious substance which is unsafe, (C) which consists in whole or in part of any diseased, contaminated, filthy, putrid or decomposed substance or is otherwise unfit for food, (D) which has been produced, prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth or may have been rendered diseased, unwholesome or injurious to health, or (E) whose packaging or container is composed in whole or in part of any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render the contents injurious to health. See Connecticut General Statutes 22-127
  • Appeal: A request made after a trial, asking another court (usually the court of appeals) to decide whether the trial was conducted properly. To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal." One who appeals is called the appellant.
  • Commissioner: means the Commissioner of Agriculture. See Connecticut General Statutes 22-127
  • Damages: Money paid by defendants to successful plaintiffs in civil cases to compensate the plaintiffs for their injuries.
  • Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
  • Misbranded: means the use of any label, written or printed advertising or graphic upon or accompanying a product or container of milk, milk products or cheese, including, but not limited to, signs, electronic displays, electronic communication, placards or other means of communication intended to provide information to consumers, which is false or misleading or which violates any applicable municipal, state or federal labeling requirement. See Connecticut General Statutes 22-127
  • Probable cause: A reasonable ground for belief that the offender violated a specific law.

(b) Whenever the commissioner finds or has probable cause to believe that any milk, milk product or cheese is adulterated, misbranded or deleterious to health, the commissioner or the commissioner’s duly authorized agent may affix to such milk, milk product or cheese a tag or other appropriate marking, giving warning that such milk, milk product or cheese is or is suspected of being adulterated or misbranded. No person shall remove or dispose of such milk, milk product or cheese by sale or otherwise without the express permission of the commissioner or the commissioner’s duly authorized agent. Not later than twenty-four hours after such tagging or marking, the commissioner or the commissioner’s duly authorized agent shall notify the owner or custodian of such milk, milk product or cheese of the commissioner’s or the commissioner’s agent’s findings, or of any violations or proposed disposition and of the right to a hearing. Any person aggrieved by an order of the commissioner may request a hearing before the commissioner not more than five days after the issuance of such order. The hearing shall be conducted not later than twenty days after the tagging or marking of any milk product or cheese and not later than ten days after the tagging or marking of any perishable fluid milk.

(c) Following such hearing the commissioner shall make a determination as to whether such milk, milk product or cheese complies with the provisions of this chapter, chapter 431 and any regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter or chapter 431 and is safe for use as a food. If the commissioner determines the milk, milk product or cheese is unsafe or unfit for use as food, the commissioner may order the owner or custodian to destroy or dispose of such milk, milk product or cheese. The commissioner or the commissioner’s duly authorized agent shall supervise the destruction or other disposition of such milk, milk product or cheese. If the commissioner finds the milk, milk product or cheese is safe for use as food and is not detrimental to public health, or can be properly packaged, marked or otherwise brought into compliance with the provisions of this chapter, chapter 431, or any regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter or chapter 431, the commissioner may order such milk, milk product or cheese to be so packaged, marked or otherwise brought into compliance and may thereafter authorize the release of such milk, milk product or cheese. The owner or custodian of such milk, milk product or cheese shall pay the costs of storage, handling and other incidental expenses.

(d) A certificate of analysis from a laboratory of the Department of Public Health, the Agricultural Experiment Station, the United States Food and Drug Administration, the United States Department of Agriculture or The University of Connecticut Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory or other certified laboratory acceptable to the commissioner shall be considered prima facie evidence of the ingredients and constituents of a sample of milk, milk product or cheese.

(e) Any person aggrieved by the determination of the commissioner may appeal therefrom in accordance with the provisions of § 4-183.

(f) The commissioner shall not be liable for any damages caused by the seizure, embargo, destruction, tagging or marking of any milk, milk products or cheese pursuant to this section unless a court finds there was no probable cause for such tagging or marking.