North Dakota Code 16.1-16-08 – Judgment in election contest action
1. The judge in an election contest action shall pronounce judgment on which candidate was elected or nominated and whether any question or proposition was approved or rejected.
Terms Used In North Dakota Code 16.1-16-08
- candidate: means :
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- following: when used by way of reference to a chapter or other part of a statute means the next preceding or next following chapter or other part. See North Dakota Code 1-01-49
- Impeachment: (1) The process of calling something into question, as in "impeaching the testimony of a witness." (2) The constitutional process whereby the House of Representatives may "impeach" (accuse of misconduct) high officers of the federal government for trial in the Senate.
- Person: means an individual, organization, government, political subdivision, or government agency or instrumentality. See North Dakota Code 1-01-49
- State: when applied to the different parts of the United States, includes the District of Columbia and the territories. See North Dakota Code 1-01-49
2. The appropriate officer shall issue a certificate to the person declared elected or nominated in accordance with the judgment. Any certificate of nomination or election previously issued that is in conflict with the judgment is annulled by the court’s judgment.
3. If the court declares that the election resulted in a tie, the election must be determined by law.
4. If the court declares that no one was elected or nominated and sets aside the election, the office must be deemed vacant and any certificate of election or nomination previously issued is annulled. The vacancy must be filled according to law. This subsection does not apply if an incumbent is in office and is entitled to serve until a successor is duly elected and qualified, in which event the incumbent may only be removed by impeachment.
5. In the discretion of the court, court costs may be awarded on the following bases:
a. If the contest action is dismissed for insufficient evidence or want of prosecution, or if the court confirms the election results, judgment for costs must be for the contestee and against the contestant.
b. If an election is annulled for errors or malfeasance of any election official during any part of the election procedure, the costs must be a charge against the state or political subdivision in which the election was held.
c. When an election is annulled on any other ground or when the contestant is declared elected, judgment for costs must be for the contestant and against the contestee.
6. Nothing in this chapter may be construed to authorize a nomination or election to be set aside because of illegal votes unless either of the following is shown, that:
a. The contestee had knowledge of or connived in the illegal votes.
b. If the number of illegal votes is taken from the contestee, it would reduce the number of the contestee’s legal votes below the number of votes cast for some other person for the same nomination or election, after deducting any illegal votes from the other person.