Illinois Compiled Statutes 510 ILCS 87/10 – Prohibition on the use of dogs or cats in toxicological experiments; exemptions; enforcement
Current as of: 2024 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
(a) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, and in addition to the prohibitions set forth in law, a testing facility shall not conduct a canine or feline toxicological experiment in this State unless the experiment is conducted for any of the following purposes:
(1) Medical research.
(2) To comply with federal requirements pertaining
(1) Medical research.
Terms Used In Illinois Compiled Statutes 510 ILCS 87/10
- Discovery: Lawyers' examination, before trial, of facts and documents in possession of the opponents to help the lawyers prepare for trial.
- Injunction: An order of the court prohibiting (or compelling) the performance of a specific act to prevent irreparable damage or injury.
- State: when applied to different parts of the United States, may be construed to include the District of Columbia and the several territories, and the words "United States" may be construed to include the said district and territories. See Illinois Compiled Statutes 5 ILCS 70/1.14
- United States: may be construed to include the said district and territories. See Illinois Compiled Statutes 5 ILCS 70/1.14
(2) To comply with federal requirements pertaining
|
to the approval or maintenance of a medical device, as defined under Section 321(h) of Title 21 of the United States Code.
|
(3) To achieve discovery, approval, or maintenance
|
of a drug, pursuant to a testing requirement imposed by the United States Food and Drug Administration under Section 505 or 512 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or Section 351 of the Public Health Service Act or any binding agency regulation promulgated upon notice and comment thereunder, if the United States Food and Drug Administration has not otherwise expressly authorized drug manufacturers to use alternative test methods.
|
(4) To achieve discovery, approval, or maintenance
|
of a biologic, pursuant to a testing requirement imposed by the United States Department of Agriculture under the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act or any binding agency regulation promulgated upon notice and comment thereunder, if the United States Department of Agriculture has not concluded that waivers shall be granted for the experimentation or studies or expressly indicated acceptance of alternative test methods.
|
(5) To achieve discovery, approval, registration,
|
or maintenance of a pesticide, pursuant to a testing requirement imposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, or any binding agency regulation promulgated upon notice and comment thereunder, if the Environmental Protection Agency has not concluded that waivers shall be granted for such experimentation or studies or expressly indicated acceptance of alternative test methods.
|
(6) To comply with a requirement to conduct the
|
experiment under the Toxic Substances Control Act, if the United States Environmental Protection Agency has not, pursuant to Section 2603(h) of Title 15 of the United States Code, concluded that waivers shall be granted for such experimentation or studies or expressly indicated acceptance of testing methods alternative to laboratory animal testing, including, but not limited to, in vitro, in silico, and in chemico approaches for identifying skin sensitization hazards.
|
(b)(1) The Attorney General or a State’s Attorney in the county in which a violation of this Act occurred may bring an action in the name of the People of the State to enforce the provisions of this Act.
(2) Whenever the Attorney General, or a State’s Attorney in the county in which a violation of this Act occurred, has reason to believe that a testing facility has in engaged in or is engaging in any practice in violation of this Act, and that proceedings would be in the public interest, he or she may bring an action in the name of the People of the State against such testing facility to restrain by preliminary or permanent injunction the use of that practice.
(3) If the court determines that the Attorney General or State’s Attorney is the prevailing party in an action filed pursuant to paragraph (1), the official may recover a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 for each day that each dog or each cat is used in a canine or feline toxicological experiment in violation of this Section. In addition to the civil penalty, the official may also recover court costs and attorney’s fees.
(c) The prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to testing or experimentation conducted for the purpose of developing, manufacturing, or marketing any product intended for beneficial use in dogs or cats.
(2) Whenever the Attorney General, or a State’s Attorney in the county in which a violation of this Act occurred, has reason to believe that a testing facility has in engaged in or is engaging in any practice in violation of this Act, and that proceedings would be in the public interest, he or she may bring an action in the name of the People of the State against such testing facility to restrain by preliminary or permanent injunction the use of that practice.
(3) If the court determines that the Attorney General or State’s Attorney is the prevailing party in an action filed pursuant to paragraph (1), the official may recover a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 for each day that each dog or each cat is used in a canine or feline toxicological experiment in violation of this Section. In addition to the civil penalty, the official may also recover court costs and attorney’s fees.
(c) The prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to testing or experimentation conducted for the purpose of developing, manufacturing, or marketing any product intended for beneficial use in dogs or cats.