20. a. (1) Whenever, on the basis of available information, the board has reasonable grounds for belief in the existence of facts warranting further investigation that a solid waste collector is charging rates or charges for solid waste collection services which exceed rates or charges that would have resulted from effective competition, the board shall transmit a notice to the solid waste collector stating that the board intends to review the rates or charges received by that solid waste collector. The notice shall enumerate the reasons for the review and the criteria utilized by the board in making a determination that a lack of effective competition exists.

(2) The board may, within 30 days following the date of notice, request that the solid waste collector submit any additional information needed to assist in its review. In the event that additional information is requested, the board shall outline, in writing, why it deems such information necessary to make an informed determination on whether the collector is charging rates or charges for solid waste collection services which exceed rates or charges that would have resulted from effective competition. The board shall complete its review of the rates or charges received by the solid waste collector no later than 60 days following the date of the notice, except if the board requests additional information from the solid waste collector, the board shall complete its review within 60 days of receipt of all requested information.

(3) Upon completing its review, the board may, after hearing, by order in writing, issue an order to the solid waste collector charging such excessive rates or charges to reduce the rates or charges received for solid waste collection services to a sum which would result from effective competition.

b. The board may issue an order to any person engaged in the business of solid waste collection to reduce the rates or charges received for solid waste collection services to a sum which would result from effective competition if the following conditions are met:

(1) the board has determined that a lack of effective competition exists within a specific geographic area, or within a specific class of customers or type of solid waste collection services; and

(2) the board has determined that the lack of effective competition has resulted in rates or charges received for solid waste collection services which exceed rates or charges that would have resulted from effective competition.

In making a determination pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection, the board shall not consider technical or economic factors that are not directly related to the provision of solid waste collection services.

In making a determination pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection, the board shall compare the rates or charges received by the solid waste collector charging such excessive rates or charges with those received by other solid waste collectors for solid waste collection services within a comparable geographic area, class of customers or type of service. The board, if it deems that such information is necessary, may review the revenues, income or expenditures of the solid waste collector charging such excessive rates or charges, except that the board shall not consider any revenues, income or expenditures derived from recycling activities.

Any order issued by the board pursuant to this subsection shall expire no later than the first day of the seventh month following the effective date of the order, except that an order may remain in effect pending the adjudication of a contested case.

c. In issuing an order pursuant to subsection b. of this section, the board may:

(1) direct the solid waste collector to refund, at an interest rate to be determined by the board, the difference between the excessive rates or charges and the competitive rates or charges ordered by the board as of the date of the notice of the board’s intention to review the rates or charges received by that solid waste collector;

(2) take other actions pursuant to law as may be needed to restore or promote effective competition within the affected geographic area, class of customers or type of service; or

(3) make recommendations as to the steps needed to restore or promote effective competition within the affected geographic area, class of customers or type of service.

d. (1) No later than 6 months after issuing an order pursuant to subsection b. of this section, the board shall review the actions taken pursuant thereto and make a determination as to whether a lack of effective competition still exists within the affected geographic area, class of customers or type of service, or whether the continued lack of effective competition has resulted in rates or charges received for solid waste collection services which exceed rates or charges that would have resulted from effective competition.

(2) The board shall, upon a determination that effective competition exists within the affected geographic area, class of customers or type of service, rescind any such order and cease any further rate setting activity with respect to the solid waste collector subject to that order.

(3) The board may, upon a written determination that a lack of effective competition still exists within the affected geographic area, class of customers or type of service, and that the continued lack of effective competition has resulted in rates or charges received for solid waste collection services which exceed rates or charges that would have resulted from effective competition, issue a new order pursuant to subsection b. of this section and continue rate setting activity with respect to the solid waste collector subject to that order as provided in subsection c. of this section.

L.1991,c.381,c.20.