Sec. 8. (a) A creditor may not make a high cost home loan without regard to repayment ability.

     (b) If a creditor presents evidence that the creditor followed commercially reasonable practices in determining the borrower’s debt to income ratio, there is a rebuttable presumption that the creditor made the high cost home loan with due regard to repayment ability. For purposes of this section, there is a rebuttable presumption that the borrower’s statement of income provided to the creditor is true and complete.

Terms Used In Indiana Code 24-9-4-8

  • Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
  • United States: includes the District of Columbia and the commonwealths, possessions, states in free association with the United States, and the territories. See Indiana Code 1-1-4-5
     (c) Commercially reasonable practices include the use of:

(1) the debt to income ratio:

(A) listed in 38 C.F.R. § 36.4337(c)(1); and

(B) defined in 38 C.F.R. § 36.4337(d); and

(2) the residual income guidelines established under:

(A) 38 C.F.R. § 36.4337(e); and

(B) United States Department of Veterans Affairs form 26-6393.

As added by P.L.73-2004, SEC.33.