Arizona Laws 20-2508. Denial, suspension or revocation of certificates; hearing; civil penalties
A. The director shall deny a certificate if the director finds that the utilization review agent does not:
Terms Used In Arizona Laws 20-2508
- Action: includes any matter or proceeding in a court, civil or criminal. See Arizona Laws 1-215
- Corporation: A legal entity owned by the holders of shares of stock that have been issued, and that can own, receive, and transfer property, and carry on business in its own name.
- department: means the department of insurance and financial institutions. See Arizona Laws 20-101
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- Moral turpitude: means an offense, whether a misdemeanor or felony, that is related to extortion, burglary, larceny, bribery, embezzlement, robbery, racketeering, money laundering, forgery, fraud, murder, voluntary manslaughter or a sexual offense that requires the individual to register pursuant to section 13-3821. See Arizona Laws 1-215
- Person: includes a corporation, company, partnership, firm, association or society, as well as a natural person. See Arizona Laws 1-215
- Service: means a diagnostic or therapeutic medical or health care service, benefit or treatment. See Arizona Laws 20-2501
- Utilization review: means a system for reviewing the appropriate and efficient allocation of inpatient hospital resources, inpatient medical services and outpatient surgery services that are being given or are proposed to be given to a patient, and of any medical, surgical and health care services or claims for services that may be covered by a health care insurer depending on determinable contingencies, including without limitation outpatient services, in-office consultations with medical specialists, specialized diagnostic testing, mental health services, emergency care and inpatient and outpatient hospital services. See Arizona Laws 20-2501
- Utilization review agent: means a person or entity that performs utilization review. See Arizona Laws 20-2501
1. Have an allopathic or osteopathic physician available to supervise utilization review activities of any medical, surgical or health care services except that:
(a) A dental service corporation that is licensed pursuant to chapter 4, article 3 of this title and a prepaid dental plan organization that is licensed pursuant to chapter 4, article 7 of this title may have a licensed dentist supervise or conduct utilization review activities for health care services that involve dental care.
(b) An optometric service corporation that is licensed pursuant to chapter 4, article 3 of this title may have a licensed optometrist supervise or conduct utilization review activities for health care services that involve optometric care.
(c) A utilization review agent shall have a licensed chiropractor supervise or conduct utilization review activities for health care services that are performed by a chiropractor and within the chiropractor’s scope of practice pursuant to Title 32, Chapter 8.
2. Meet all applicable department rules relating to the qualifications of utilization review agents or the performance of utilization review.
3. Provide assurances satisfactory to the director that the procedure and policies of the utilization review agent will protect the confidentiality of medical records and the utilization review agent will be reasonably accessible to patients and providers in this state and the department by a toll free telephone line or by acceptance of long-distance collect calls for forty hours each week during normal business hours.
B. The director shall deny a certificate to a utilization review agent who has been convicted of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude or a felony or who employs a person who has been convicted of a felony.
C. The director may suspend, revoke or refuse to renew a certificate issued under this chapter if after giving notice to the utilization review agent, and holding a hearing if demanded by the agent, the director finds that the agent has violated this chapter or a rule adopted under this chapter.
D. If after a hearing the director finds that the agent has violated this chapter or an applicable rule or order adopted under this chapter, the director shall issue an order that specifies the violation and may impose a civil penalty of not more than two hundred fifty dollars for each violation or an aggregate civil penalty of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars. The director may also impose a civil penalty of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars for each knowing violation or an aggregate civil penalty of not more than fifteen thousand dollars. The director shall deposit, pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147, all monies in the state general fund. A civil penalty is in addition to any other applicable penalty or restraint provided in this chapter and may be recovered in a civil action brought by the director.
E. A certificate does not expire or terminate until a pending department investigation is resolved but is suspended on the date it would otherwise expire or terminate. The utilization review agent shall not transact business in this state until the investigation is completed.
F. When the director suspends or revokes a certificate the director shall immediately notify the utilization review agent either by personal service or by mail addressed to the agent at the agent’s address of record. Notice by mail is effective at the time it is mailed.
G. The utilization review agent shall deliver a revoked or suspended certificate to the director on the director’s request.
H. The director shall not issue a new certificate earlier than one year after the date of a previous revocation. Agents shall reapply to the director and shall meet all the requirements of this chapter to obtain a new certificate.
I. If the certificate of a firm or corporation is suspended or revoked, no member of that firm or officer or director of the corporation may hold a certificate during the period of the suspension or revocation unless the director determines, based on substantial evidence, that the member, officer or corporation director was not personally at fault.