California Welfare and Institutions Code 358 – (a) After finding that a child is a person described in Section …
(a) After finding that a child is a person described in Section 300, the court shall hear evidence on the question of the proper disposition to be made of the child. Prior to making a finding required by this section, the court may continue the hearing on its own motion, the motion of the parent or guardian, or the motion of the child, as follows:
(1) If the child is detained during the continuance, and the social worker is not alleging that subdivision (b) of Section 361.5 is applicable, the continuance shall not exceed 10 judicial days. The court may make an order for detention of the child or for the child’s release from detention, during the period of continuance, as is appropriate.
Terms Used In California Welfare and Institutions Code 358
- Amendment: A proposal to alter the text of a pending bill or other measure by striking out some of it, by inserting new language, or both. Before an amendment becomes part of the measure, thelegislature must agree to it.
- Continuance: Putting off of a hearing ot trial until a later time.
- Custody: means physical custody or legal custody or both, under any applicable tribal law or tribal custom or state law. See California Welfare and Institutions Code 224.1
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- Guardian: A person legally empowered and charged with the duty of taking care of and managing the property of another person who because of age, intellect, or health, is incapable of managing his (her) own affairs.
- Jurisdiction: (1) The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when two courts have simultaneous responsibility for the same case. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases.
- social worker: shall include the juvenile probation officer or the person who is both the juvenile probation officer and the adult probation officer, and any social worker in a county welfare department or any social worker in a California Indian tribe or any out-of-state Indian tribe that has reservation land that extends into the state that has authority, pursuant to an agreement with the department concerning child welfare services or foster care payments under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program when supervising dependent children of the juvenile court pursuant to Section 272 by order of the court under Section 300, and the term "department of probation" shall mean the department of juvenile probation or the department wherein the services of juvenile and adult probation are both performed. See California Welfare and Institutions Code 215
(2) If the child is not detained during the continuance, the continuance shall not exceed 30 days after the date of the finding pursuant to Section 356. However, the court may, for cause, continue the hearing for an additional 15 days.
(3) If the social worker is alleging that subdivision (b) of Section 361.5 is applicable, the court shall continue the proceedings for a period not to exceed 30 days. The social worker shall notify each parent of the content of subdivision (b) of Section 361.5 and shall inform each parent that if the court does not order reunification a permanency planning hearing will be held, and that their parental rights may be terminated within the timeframes specified by law.
(b) (1) Before determining the appropriate disposition, the court shall receive in evidence the social study of the child made by the social worker, any study or evaluation made by a child advocate appointed by the court, and other relevant and material evidence as may be offered, including, but not limited to, the willingness of the caregiver to provide legal permanency for the child if reunification is unsuccessful. In any judgment and order of disposition, the court shall specifically state that the social study made by the social worker and the study or evaluation made by the child advocate appointed by the court, if there be any, has been read and considered by the court in arriving at its judgment and order of disposition. Any social study or report submitted to the court by the social worker shall include the individual child’s case plan developed pursuant to Section 16501.1.
(2) Whenever a child is removed from a parent’s or guardian’s custody, the court shall make a finding as to whether the social worker has exercised due diligence in conducting the investigation, as required pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 309, to identify, locate, and notify the child’s relatives, including both maternal and paternal relatives.
(3) When making the determination required pursuant to paragraph (2), the court may consider, among other examples of due diligence, the extent to which the social worker has complied with paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 309, and has done any of the following:
(A) Asked the child, in an age-appropriate manner and consistent with the child’s best interest, about their relatives.
(B) Obtained information regarding the location of the child’s relatives.
(C) Reviewed the child’s case file for any information regarding the child’s relatives.
(D) Telephoned, emailed, or visited all identified relatives.
(E) Asked located relatives for the names and locations of other relatives.
(F) Used internet search tools to locate relatives identified as supports.
(c) If the court finds that a child is described by subdivision (h) of Section 300 or that subdivision (b) of Section 361.5 may be applicable, the court shall conduct the dispositional proceeding pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 361.5.
(d) (1) The court shall hold a dispositional proceeding for a youth 18 years of age if both of the following requirements are met:
(A) The youth was found to be a minor described in Section 300 at a hearing pursuant to Section 355 prior to the youth attaining 18 years of age, and was continuously detained pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 319.
(B) The youth has provided informed consent to the dispositional proceeding.
(2) For purposes of this subdivision, the fact that a youth has attained 18 years of age shall not be cause to relieve counsel appointed pursuant to Section 317.
(3) A dispositional proceeding for a youth as described in paragraph (1) shall be held within 30 days of the date of the finding pursuant to Section 355.
(4) At the dispositional proceeding, the court shall determine by clear and convincing evidence if at least one of the conditions described in subdivision (c) of Section 361 existed immediately prior to the youth attaining 18 years of age.
(5) (A) If the youth does not provide informed consent to the dispositional proceeding, or the court does not find the criteria described in paragraph (4), the court shall vacate the temporary orders made under Section 319 and dependency or general jurisdiction shall not be retained.
(B) If the court finds that the youth meets the criteria described in paragraph (4) but chooses not to remain in foster care, the court shall set a hearing for termination of jurisdiction pursuant to Section 391 within 30 days.
(6) For purposes of the definition of “nonminor dependent” pursuant to subdivision (v) of Section 11400, an order for foster care placement made at disposition pursuant to this subdivision shall be treated as though the nonminor attained 18 years of age while under an order of foster care placement by the juvenile court.
(7) Implementation of this subdivision is subject to federal approval of the state plan amendment made under Title IV-E of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 670 et seq.), and shall be operative as of the date of federal approval.
(8) On or before July 1, 2020, the Judicial Council shall amend or adopt rules of court, and shall develop or amend appropriate forms, as necessary to implement this subdivision.
(Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 682, Sec. 1. (AB 748) Effective January 1, 2020.)