Indiana Code 26-1-4.1-202. Authorized and verified payment orders; security procedures; commercial reasonableness
Terms Used In Indiana Code 26-1-4.1-202
(c) Commercial reasonableness of a security procedure is a question of law to be determined by considering the wishes of the customer expressed to the bank, the circumstances of the customer known to the bank, including the size, type, and frequency of payment orders normally issued by the customer to the bank, alternative security procedures offered to the customer, and security procedures in general use by customers and receiving banks similarly situated. A security procedure is deemed to be commercially reasonable if (i) the security procedure was chosen by the customer after the bank offered, and the customer refused, a security procedure that was commercially reasonable for that customer, and (ii) the customer expressly agreed in a record to be bound by any payment order, whether or not authorized, issued in its name and accepted by the bank in compliance with the bank’s obligations under the security procedure chosen by the customer.
(d) The term “sender” in IC 26-1-4.1 includes the customer in whose name a payment order is issued if the order is the authorized order of the customer under subsection (a), or it is effective as the order of the customer under subsection (b).
(e) This section applies to amendments and cancellations of payment orders to the same extent it applies to payment orders.
(f) Except as provided in this section and in IC 26-1-4.1-203(a)(1), rights and obligations arising under this section or IC 26-1-4.1-203 may not be varied by agreement.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4. Amended by P.L.199-2023, SEC.24.
