Subdivision 1.With petition.

When a petition is brought by the commissioner or local agency, a copy of the comprehensive evaluation shall be filed with the petition. If a petition is brought by a person other than the commissioner or local agency and a comprehensive evaluation has been prepared within a year of the filing of the petition, the local agency shall send a copy of the comprehensive evaluation to the court upon notice of the filing of the petition. If a comprehensive evaluation has not been prepared within a year of the filing of the petition, the local agency, upon notice of the filing of the petition, shall arrange for a comprehensive evaluation to be prepared and provided to the court within 90 days.

Subd. 2.Copies.

Terms Used In Minnesota Statutes 252A.07

  • Affidavit: A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making it, before a notary or officer having authority to administer oaths.
  • Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
  • Guardian: A person legally empowered and charged with the duty of taking care of and managing the property of another person who because of age, intellect, or health, is incapable of managing his (her) own affairs.
  • Person: may extend and be applied to bodies politic and corporate, and to partnerships and other unincorporated associations. See Minnesota Statutes 645.44

A copy of the comprehensive evaluation shall be made available by the court to the proposed person subject to public guardianship, the counsel of the proposed person subject to public guardianship, the county attorney, the attorney general, and the petitioner.

Subd. 3.Evaluation required; exception.

(a) No action for the appointment of a public guardian may proceed to hearing unless a comprehensive evaluation has been first filed with the court.

(b) Paragraph (a) does not apply if the director of the local agency responsible for conducting the comprehensive evaluation has filed an affidavit that the proposed person subject to public guardianship refused to participate in the comprehensive evaluation and the court finds on the basis of clear and convincing evidence that the proposed person subject to public guardianship is developmentally disabled and in need of the supervision and protection of a guardian.