2-5-104. Determination of need for negotiated rulemaking committee. (1) An agency may establish a negotiated rulemaking committee to negotiate and develop a proposed rule if the agency director determines that the use of the negotiated rulemaking procedure is in the public interest. In making that determination, the agency director shall consider whether:

Terms Used In Montana Code 2-5-104

  • Agency: means any board, bureau, commission, department, authority, or officer of the executive branch of state government authorized or required by law to make rules. See Montana Code 2-5-103
  • committee: means an advisory committee established under 2-5-106 and authorized under 2-4-304 to consider and discuss issues for the purpose of reaching a consensus in the development of a proposed rule. See Montana Code 2-5-103
  • Consensus: means unanimous concurrence among the interests represented on a negotiated rulemaking committee established under 2-5-106 unless the committee agrees upon another specified definition. See Montana Code 2-5-103
  • Convener: means a person who impartially assists an agency in determining whether establishment of a negotiated rulemaking committee is feasible and appropriate for a particular rulemaking procedure. See Montana Code 2-5-103
  • Interest: means , with respect to an issue or matter, multiple parties that have a similar point of view or that are likely to be affected in a similar manner. See Montana Code 2-5-103
  • Negotiated rulemaking: means rulemaking through the use of a negotiated rulemaking committee. See Montana Code 2-5-103
  • Rule: means an agency regulation, standard, or statement of general applicability that implements, interprets, or prescribes law or policy or describes the organization, procedures, or practice requirements of an agency. See Montana Code 2-5-103

(a)there is a need for a rule;

(b)there are a limited number of identifiable interests that will be significantly affected by the rule;

(c)there is a reasonable likelihood that a committee can be convened with a balanced representation of persons who:

(i)can adequately represent the interests identified under subsection (1)(b); and

(ii)are willing to negotiate in good faith to reach a consensus on the proposed rule;

(d)there is a reasonable likelihood that a committee will reach a consensus on the proposed rule within a fixed period of time;

(e)the negotiated rulemaking procedure will not unreasonably delay the notice of proposed rulemaking and the issuance of the final rule;

(f)the agency has adequate resources and is willing to commit those resources, including technical assistance, to the committee; and

(g)the agency, to the maximum extent possible consistent with the legal obligations of the agency, will use the consensus of the committee as the basis for the rule proposed by the agency.

(2)An agency may use the services of a convener to assist in making the determination of need pursuant to subsection (1) and to assist the agency in:

(a)identifying persons who will be significantly affected by a proposed rule; and

(b)conducting discussions with affected persons on the issues of concern and ascertaining whether the establishment of a negotiated rulemaking committee is feasible and appropriate for the particular rulemaking procedure.

(3)The convener shall report findings and make recommendations to the agency. Upon request of the agency, the convener shall ascertain the names of persons who are willing and qualified to represent the interests that will be significantly affected by the proposed rule. The report and any recommendations of the convener must be made available to the public upon request.

  Previous
Next  
 Part 1 Contents