Terms Used In New Jersey Statutes 17:27A-8

  • Equitable: Pertaining to civil suits in "equity" rather than in "law." In English legal history, the courts of "law" could order the payment of damages and could afford no other remedy. See damages. A separate court of "equity" could order someone to do something or to cease to do something. See, e.g., injunction. In American jurisprudence, the federal courts have both legal and equitable power, but the distinction is still an important one. For example, a trial by jury is normally available in "law" cases but not in "equity" cases. Source: U.S. Courts
  • person: includes corporations, companies, associations, societies, firms, partnerships and joint stock companies as well as individuals, unless restricted by the context to an individual as distinguished from a corporate entity or specifically restricted to one or some of the above enumerated synonyms and, when used to designate the owner of property which may be the subject of an offense, includes this State, the United States, any other State of the United States as defined infra and any foreign country or government lawfully owning or possessing property within this State. See New Jersey Statutes 1:1-2
  • Quorum: The number of legislators that must be present to do business.
  • Sequester: To separate. Sometimes juries are sequestered from outside influences during their deliberations.
  • State: extends to and includes any State, territory or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia and the Canal Zone. See New Jersey Statutes 1:1-2
8. Injunctions; prohibitions against voting securities, sequestration of voting securities.

a. Injunctions. Whenever it appears to the commissioner that any person or any director, officer, employee or agent thereof has committed or is about to commit a violation of this chapter or of any rule, regulation, or order issued by the commissioner hereunder, the commissioner may apply to the Superior Court for an order enjoining such person or such director, officer, employee or agent thereof from violating or continuing to violate this chapter or any such rule, regulation or order, and for such other equitable relief as the nature of the case and the interests of the insurer’s policyholders, creditors and shareholders or the public may require.

b. Voting of securities; when prohibited. No security or proxy which is the subject of any agreement, arrangement, or understanding regarding acquisition, or which is acquired or to be acquired, in contravention of the provisions of this chapter or of any rule, regulation or order issued by the commissioner hereunder may be voted at any shareholders’ meeting, or may be counted for quorum purposes, and any action of shareholders requiring the affirmative vote of a percentage of shares may be taken as though such securities, including securities that may be voted pursuant to those proxies, were not issued and outstanding; but no action taken at any such meeting shall be invalidated by the voting of such securities, unless the action would materially affect control of the insurer or unless the courts of this State have so ordered. If an insurer or the commissioner has reason to believe that any security or proxy of the insurer or other person controlling the insurer has been or is about to be acquired in contravention of the provisions of this chapter or of any rule, regulation or order issued by the commissioner hereunder the insurer or the commissioner may apply to the Superior Court to enjoin any offer, request, invitation, agreement or acquisition made in contravention of section 2 of P.L.1970, c.22 (C. 17:27A-2) or any rule, regulation, or order issued by the commissioner thereunder to enjoin the voting of any security or proxy so acquired, to void any vote of such security or proxy already cast at any meeting of shareholders, and for such other equitable relief as the nature of the case and the interests of the insurer’s policyholders, creditors and shareholders or the public may require.

c. Sequestration of voting securities. In any case where a person has acquired or is proposing to acquire any voting securities or proxies in violation of this chapter or any rule, regulation or order issued by the commissioner hereunder, the Superior Court may, on such notice as the court deems appropriate, upon the application of the insurer or the commissioner seize or sequester any voting securities or proxies of the insurer owned directly or indirectly by such person, and issue such orders with respect thereto as may be appropriate to effectuate the provisions of this chapter. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, for the purposes of this chapter the situs of the ownership of the securities of domestic insurers shall be deemed to be in this State.

L.1970,c.22,s.8; amended 1995,c.338,s.4; 2021, c.485, s.3.