New Jersey Statutes 45:14B-34. Review procedure
Terms Used In New Jersey Statutes 45:14B-34
- Fraud: Intentional deception resulting in injury to another.
- person: includes corporations, companies, associations, societies, firms, partnerships and joint stock companies as well as individuals, unless restricted by the context to an individual as distinguished from a corporate entity or specifically restricted to one or some of the above enumerated synonyms and, when used to designate the owner of property which may be the subject of an offense, includes this State, the United States, any other State of the United States as defined infra and any foreign country or government lawfully owning or possessing property within this State. See New Jersey Statutes 1:1-2
- State: extends to and includes any State, territory or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia and the Canal Zone. See New Jersey Statutes 1:1-2
a. The treating psychologist shall provide in writing to the reviewers the following information: the case identification number; the status of the patient; duration and frequency of treatment; the diagnosis; the prognosis; and the level of functioning and the level of distress, both described by the terms mild, moderate, severe or extreme. If on the basis of this information the reviewers can certify that the treatment is usual, customary or reasonable, no further review shall be necessary at that time.
b. If the reviewers cannot make this determination from the information provided, the reviewers shall request the treating psychologist to provide a written statement describing his customary mode of treatment for the particular diagnosis given. If, on the basis of this information, the reviewers can certify that the treatment is usual, customary or reasonable, no further review shall be conducted at that time.
c. If the reviewers cannot make this determination from the information provided, they shall request the treating psychologist to provide details and circumstances concerning the case under review. The reviewers shall then certify to the third-party payor their conclusion as to whether or not the treatment in question is usual, customary or reasonable, and the date and length of time of the consultation.
d. A negative conclusion by the reviewers pursuant to this section shall not be used retroactively as a basis for denying benefits for the treatment furnished prior to the review request by the third-party payor, unless the claim for reimbursement involves fraud or was not filed in a timely manner.
L. 1985, c. 256, s. 4.