Connecticut General Statutes 47-261f – Litigation involving declarant
(a) The following requirements apply to an association’s authority under subdivision (4) of subsection (a) of § 47-244 to institute and maintain a proceeding alleging a construction defect with respect to the common interest community, whether by litigation, mediation, arbitration or administratively, against a declarant or an employee, independent contractor or other person directly or indirectly providing labor or materials to a declarant:
Terms Used In Connecticut General Statutes 47-261f
- Damages: Money paid by defendants to successful plaintiffs in civil cases to compensate the plaintiffs for their injuries.
- Equitable: Pertaining to civil suits in "equity" rather than in "law." In English legal history, the courts of "law" could order the payment of damages and could afford no other remedy. See damages. A separate court of "equity" could order someone to do something or to cease to do something. See, e.g., injunction. In American jurisprudence, the federal courts have both legal and equitable power, but the distinction is still an important one. For example, a trial by jury is normally available in "law" cases but not in "equity" cases. Source: U.S. Courts
- Litigation: A case, controversy, or lawsuit. Participants (plaintiffs and defendants) in lawsuits are called litigants.
- Statute: A law passed by a legislature.
(1) Subject to subsections (e) and (f) of this section, before the association institutes a proceeding described in this section, it shall provide notice in a record of its claims to the declarant and those persons that the association seeks to hold liable for the claimed defects. The text of the notice may be in any form reasonably calculated to give notice of the general nature of the association’s claims, including a list of the claimed defects. The notice may be delivered by any method of service and may be addressed to any person if the method of service used: (A) Provides actual notice to the person named in the claim; or (B) would be sufficient to give notice to the person in connection with commencement of an action by the association against the person.
(2) Subject to subsection (e) of this section, the association may not institute a proceeding against a person until forty-five days after the association sends notice of its claim to that person.
(3) During the time period set forth in subdivision (2) of this subsection, the declarant and any other person to which the association gave notice may present to the association a plan to repair or otherwise remedy the construction defects described in the notice. If the association does not receive a timely remediation plan from a person to which it gave notice, or if the association does not accept the terms of any remediation plan submitted, the association may institute a proceeding against the person.
(4) If the association receives one or more timely remediation plans, the executive board shall consider promptly those remediation plans and notify the persons to which it directed notice whether the remediation plan is acceptable as presented, acceptable with stated conditions, or not accepted.
(5) If the association accepts a remediation plan from a person the association seeks to hold liable for the claimed defect, or if a person agrees to stated conditions to an otherwise acceptable remediation plan, the parties shall agree on a period for implementation of the remediation plan. The association may not institute a proceeding against the person during the time the remediation plan is being diligently implemented.
(6) Any statute of limitation affecting the association’s right of action against a declarant or other person is tolled during the time period set forth in subdivision (2) of this subsection and during any extension of that time because a person to which notice was directed has commenced and is diligently pursuing the remediation plan.
(b) After the time period set forth in subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of this section expires, whether or not the association agrees to any remediation plan, a proceeding may be instituted by: (1) The association against a person to which notice was directed which fails to submit a timely remediation plan, the plan of which is not acceptable, or which fails to pursue diligent implementation of that plan; or (2) a unit owner with respect to the owner’s unit and any limited common elements assigned to that unit, regardless of any action of the association.
(c) The provisions of this section do not preclude the association from making repairs necessary to mitigate damages or to correct any defect that poses a significant and immediate health or safety risk.
(d) Subject to the other provisions of this section, the determination of whether and when the association may institute a proceeding described in this section may be made by the executive board. The declaration may not require a vote by any number or percentage of unit owners as a condition to institution of a proceeding.
(e) The provisions of this section shall not prevent an association from seeking equitable relief, a remedy in aid of arbitration or a prejudgment remedy under chapter 903a at any time without complying with subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of this section.
(f) If the time for termination of any period of declarant control occurs and the declarant has failed to comply with subsection (d), (f) or (h) of § 47-245, the limitations set forth in this section and the association’s authority to institute litigation shall not apply.