Indiana Code 13-18-22-5. Contents of wetland rules
(1) must require that the applicant demonstrate, as a prerequisite to the issuance of the permit, that wetland activity:
Terms Used In Indiana Code 13-18-22-5
- Evidence: Information presented in testimony or in documents that is used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
- Property: includes personal and real property. See Indiana Code 1-1-4-5
(i) without reasonable alternative; and
(ii) reasonably necessary or appropriate;
to achieve a legitimate use proposed by the applicant on the property on which the wetland is located; and
(B) for a Class III wetland, is without practical alternative and will be accompanied by taking steps that are practicable and appropriate to minimize potential adverse impacts of the discharge on the aquatic ecosystem of the wetland;
(2) except as provided in subsection (c), must establish that compensatory mitigation will be provided as set forth in section 6 of this chapter to reasonably offset the loss of wetlands allowed by the permits; and
(3) may prescribe additional conditions that are reasonable and necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.
(b) The rules adopted under section 4 of this chapter must require, as a prerequisite to the applicability of the general permit by rule to a specific wetland activity, that the person proposing the discharge submit to the department a notice of intent to be covered by the general permit by rule that:
(1) identifies the wetlands to be affected by the wetland activity; and
(2) except as provided in subsection (c), provides a compensatory mitigation plan as set forth in section 6 of this chapter to reasonably offset the loss of wetlands allowed by the general permit.
(c) Under subsections (a) and (b), the rules adopted under sections 3 and 4 of this chapter may provide for exceptions to compensatory mitigation in specific, limited circumstances.
(d) For purposes of subsection (a)(1)(A):
(1) a resolution of the executive of the county or municipality in which the wetland is located; or
(2) a permit or other approval from a local government entity having authority over the proposed use of the property on which the wetland is located;
that includes a specific finding that the wetland activity is as described in subsection (a)(1)(A) is considered conclusive evidence of that fact.
As added by P.L.282-2003, SEC.38. Amended by P.L.52-2004, SEC.8.