Whenever the issue of insanity is submitted to the jury, the court shall instruct the jury to return a special verdict in substantially the following form:
answer yes or no
1.
Did the defendant commit the act charged?
. . . . .
2.
If your answer to number 1 is yes, do you acquit him or her because of insanity existing at the time of the act charged?
. . . . .
3.
If your answer to number 2 is yes, is the defendant a substantial danger to other persons unless kept under further control by the court or other persons or institutions?
. . . . .
4.
If your answer to number 2 is yes, does the defendant present a substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing public safety or security unless kept under further control by the court or other persons or institutions?
. . . . .
5.
If your answers to either number 3 or number 4 is yes, is it in the best interests of the defendant and others that the defendant be placed in treatment that is less restrictive than detention in a state mental hospital?
. . . . .

NOTES:

Effective datesSeverabilityIntent1998 c 297: See notes following RCW 71.05.010.

Have a question?
Click here to chat with a criminal defense lawyer and protect your rights.

Terms Used In Washington Code 10.77.040

  • Answer: The formal written statement by a defendant responding to a civil complaint and setting forth the grounds for defense.
  • Defendant: In a civil suit, the person complained against; in a criminal case, the person accused of the crime.
  • Treatment: means any currently standardized medical or mental health procedure including medication. See Washington Code 10.77.010
  • Verdict: The decision of a petit jury or a judge.