Home  > For Everyone  > Government  > [More Government Topics]  > Judiciary  > Courts  > Michigan Laws 762.3 - Jurisdiction; offenses near county lines 
Search the Michigan Compiled Laws

Michigan Laws 762.3 - Jurisdiction; offenses near county lines

Michigan Laws > Chapters 760 - 777 > Act 175 of 1927 > Chapter II > § 762.3 - Jurisdiction; offenses near county lines


Current as of: 2009

Sec. 3.

(1) Any offense committed on the boundary line of 2 counties, or within 1 mile of the dividing line between them, may be alleged in the indictment to have been committed, and may be prosecuted and punished in either county.

(2) If it appears to the attorney general that a felony has been committed within the state and that it is impossible to determine within which county it occurred, the offense may be alleged in the indictment to have been committed and may be prosecuted and punished in such county as the attorney general designates. The state shall bear all expenses of such prosecution. The responsibility and the authority with reference to all steps in the prosecution of such case shall be the same, as between the prosecuting attorney of the county so designated and the attorney general, as though it were an established fact that the alleged criminal acts, if committed at all, were committed within that county.

(3) With regard to state offenses cognizable by the examining magistrate and to examinations conducted for offenses not cognizable by the examining magistrate, the following special provisions apply:

(a) If an offense is committed on the boundary of 2 or more counties, districts or political subdivisions or within 1 mile thereof, venue is proper in any of the counties, districts or political subdivisions concerned.

(b) If an offense is committed in or upon any railroad train, automobile, aircraft, vessel or other conveyance in transit, and it cannot readily be determined in which county, district or political subdivision the offense was committed, venue is proper in any county, district or political subdivision through or over which the conveyance passed in the course of its journey.

(c) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b), if it appears to the attorney general that the alleged state offense has been committed within the state and that it is impossible to determine within which county, district or political subdivision it occurred, the violation may be alleged to have been committed and may be prosecuted and punished or the examination conducted in such county, district or political subdivision as the attorney general designates. The responsibility and the authority with reference to all steps in the prosecution of such case shall be the same, as between the prosecuting attorney of the county so designated and the attorney general, as though it were an established fact that the alleged criminal acts, if committed at all, were committed within that county, district or political subdivision.

History: 1927, Act 175, Eff. Sept. 5, 1927 ;-- CL 1929, 17121 ;-- Am. 1935, Act 151, Imd. Eff. June 4, 1935 ;-- CL 1948, 762.3 ;-- Am. 1970, Act 213, Imd. Eff. Oct. 4, 1970

Prev | Next

________________________________________________________________________

Questions & Answers: Courts

John, The 176th Criminal Court, for Harris County, Texas, is located at: Harris County Criminal Justice Center 1201 Franklin, 19th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 Steve Daily LawServ...
AFTER A CASE RECORD HAS BEEN DESTROYED WHAT WILL SHOW UP IN A BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION? ...
California; Stipulation was signed and Order attached was signed by Family Law judge saying community property bank account was divided equally and half was to be put into an accou...
Do you need to be a lawyer to become a Magistrate judge?...
i as a concerned parent want to know why the states attorneys office dropped my daughters case against the man that sexually assulted her because they were only going by a letter m...
What is the la revised statue that tells how the clerk of court office is governed and the rules of the clerk of coiurt...

Michigan Laws: Courts

Michigan Laws > Chapter 26
Michigan Laws > Chapter 600
Michigan Laws > Chapter 725
Michigan Laws > Chapter 729
Michigan Laws > Chapter 730
Michigan Laws > Chapters 760 - 777 > Act 175 of 1927 > Chapter II - Courts

U.S. Code Provisions: Courts

U.S. Code > Title 11 > Chapter 1 - General Provisions
U.S. Code > Title 11 > Chapter 3 - Case Administration
U.S. Code > Title 11 > Chapter 5 - Creditors, The Debtor, And The Estate
U.S. Code > Title 11 > Chapter 9 - Adjustment Of Debts Of A Municipality
U.S. Code > Title 11 > Chapter 15 - Ancillary And Other Cross-Border Cases
U.S. Code > Title 28 > Part I - Organization Of Courts
U.S. Code > Title 28 > Part III - Court Officers And Employees
U.S. Code Title 28 > Part IV > Chapter 81 - Supreme Court
U.S. Code Title 28 > Part IV > Chapter 83 - Courts Of Appeals
U.S. Code Title 28 > Part IV > Chapter 85 - District Courts; Jurisdiction
U.S. Code > Title 42 > Chapter 46 - Justice System Improvement
U.S. Code > Title 42 > Chapter 113 - State Justice Institute

Federal Regulations: Courts

U.S. Code > Title 11 > Chapter 1 - General Provisions
U.S. Code > Title 11 > Chapter 3 - Case Administration
U.S. Code > Title 11 > Chapter 5 - Creditors, The Debtor, And The Estate
U.S. Code > Title 11 > Chapter 9 - Adjustment Of Debts Of A Municipality
U.S. Code > Title 11 > Chapter 15 - Ancillary And Other Cross-Border Cases
U.S. Code > Title 28 > Part I - Organization Of Courts
U.S. Code > Title 28 > Part III - Court Officers And Employees
U.S. Code Title 28 > Part IV > Chapter 81 - Supreme Court
U.S. Code Title 28 > Part IV > Chapter 83 - Courts Of Appeals
U.S. Code Title 28 > Part IV > Chapter 85 - District Courts; Jurisdiction
U.S. Code > Title 42 > Chapter 46 - Justice System Improvement
U.S. Code > Title 42 > Chapter 113 - State Justice Institute
Comments (0)add comment

Post a comment or question below.
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Email  Email Print  Print   Digg

monotone-frail