Utah Code 58-37-15. Burden of proof in proceedings on violations — Enforcement officers exempt from liability
Current as of: 2023 | Check for updates
|
Other versions
(1) | It is not necessary for the state to negate any exemption or exception set forth in this act in any complaint, information, indictment or other pleading or trial, hearing, or other proceeding under this act, and the burden of proof of any exemption or exception is upon the person claiming its benefit. |
(i) | by a licensed practitioner, in the course of that practitioner's professional practice or by collaborative pharmacy practice agreement; and |
(ii) | for a controlled substance or other prescription drug or device for use by a patient or an animal. See Utah Code 58-37-2 |
(2) | In absence of proof that a person is the duly authorized holder of an appropriate license, registration, order form, or prescription issued under this act, he shall be presumed not to be the holder of a license, registration, order form, or prescription, and the burden of proof is upon him to rebut the presumption. |
(3) | No liability shall be imposed upon any duly authorized state or federal officer engaged in the enforcement of this act who is engaged in the enforcement of any law, municipal ordinance, or regulation relating to controlled substances. |
Enacted by Chapter 145, 1971 General Session