Home  > For Everyone  > Family Law  > Divorce  > Utah Code 30-3-10. Custody of children in case of separation or divorce -- Custody consideration 
Search the Utah Code

Utah Code 30-3-10. Custody of children in case of separation or divorce -- Custody consideration

Utah Code > Title 30 > Chapter 3 > § 30-3-10 - Custody of children in case of separation or divorce -- Custody consideration


Current as of: 2010

     (1) If a husband and wife having minor children are separated, or their marriage is declared void or dissolved, the court shall make an order for the future care and custody of the minor children as it considers appropriate.
     (a) In determining any form of custody, the court shall consider the best interests of the child and, among other factors the court finds relevant, the following:
     (i) the past conduct and demonstrated moral standards of each of the parties;
     (ii) which parent is most likely to act in the best interest of the child, including allowing the child frequent and continuing contact with the noncustodial parent;
     (iii) the extent of bonding between the parent and child, meaning the depth, quality, and nature of the relationship between a parent and child; and
     (iv) those factors outlined in Section 30-3-10.2.
     (b) The court shall, in every case, consider joint custody but may award any form of custody which is determined to be in the best interest of the child.
     (c) The children may not be required by either party to testify unless the trier of fact determines that extenuating circumstances exist that would necessitate the testimony of the children be heard and there is no other reasonable method to present their testimony.
     (d) The court may inquire of the children and take into consideration the children's desires regarding future custody or parent-time schedules, but the expressed desires are not controlling and the court may determine the children's custody or parent-time otherwise. The desires of a child 16 years of age or older shall be given added weight, but is not the single controlling factor.
     (e) If interviews with the children are conducted by the court pursuant to Subsection (1)(d), they shall be conducted by the judge in camera. The prior consent of the parties may be obtained but is not necessary if the court finds that an interview with the children is the only method to ascertain the child's desires regarding custody.
     (2) In awarding custody, the court shall consider, among other factors the court finds relevant, which parent is most likely to act in the best interests of the child, including allowing the child frequent and continuing contact with the noncustodial parent as the court finds appropriate.
     (3) If the court finds that one parent does not desire custody of the child, the court shall take that evidence into consideration in determining whether to award custody to the other parent.
     (4) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (4)(b), a court may not discriminate against a parent due to a disability, as defined in Section 57-21-2, in awarding custody or determining whether a substantial change has occurred for the purpose of modifying an award of custody.
     (b) If a court takes a parent's disability into account in awarding custody or determining whether a substantial change has occurred for the purpose of modifying an award of custody, the parent with a disability may rebut any evidence, presumption, or inference arising from the disability by showing that:
     (i) the disability does not significantly or substantially inhibit the parent's ability to provide for the physical and emotional needs of the child at issue; or
     (ii) the parent with a disability has sufficient human, monetary, or other resources available to supplement the parent's ability to provide for the physical and emotional needs of the

child at issue.
     (c) Nothing in this section may be construed to apply to adoption proceedings under Title 78B, Chapter 6, Part 1, Utah Adoption Act.
     (5) This section establishes neither a preference nor a presumption for or against joint legal custody, joint physical custody or sole custody, but allows the court and the family the widest discretion to choose a parenting plan that is in the best interest of the child.

previous sectionChapter 3 Table of Contentsnext section
Previous sectionChapter 3 Table of ContentsNext section

________________________________________________________________________

Questions & Answers: Divorce

I gave temporary custody to my grandparents back in 2009? I was wondering what i can do to get him back....
I was awarded Spousal support in my divorce along with a home. Due to poor financial decisions during our marriage I was unable to get the loan into my name so it remains in both o...
I have a question about marital and non-marital property. I bought my first house 13 years before I married, and 4 years after getting married I sold that house to buy another. A...
In general, and absent some very specific exceptions, all property acquired during a marriage can be considered marital property. When determining whether or not property is marit...
After 6 seperated years of a civil and communicative relationship with my daughters father we mutually decided to relocate our families (incl other children all 5 and under) to FL ...
I need forms to contest a Notice of Registration of Support Order or procedures the validity or enforcement....

Utah Laws: Divorce

Utah Code > Title 30 > Chapter 3 - Divorce
Utah Code > Title 78B > Chapter 19 - Utah Uniform Collaborative Law Act

Tennessee Code > Title 64 > Chapter 2 > Part 3 > § 64-2-310. Contracts


Current as of: 2010

All contracts of the authority shall be entered into and executed in such manner as may be prescribed by statutes, regulations and procedures governing contracting by county governments; but no contract or acquisition by purchase of equipment, apparatus, materials or supplies involving more than five hundred dollars ($500), or for construction, installation, repair or improvement of the property or facilities involving more than five hundred dollars ($500) shall be made except after such contract has been advertised for bids. Advertisement is not required when an emergency arises and requires immediate delivery of the supplies or performance of the service.

[Acts 1981, ch. 542 (Orig. Compl. as Priv. Acts 1981, ch. 57), § 11; T.C.A., § 66-2-310.]

previous sectionPart 3 Table of Contentsnext section
Previous sectionPart 3 Table of ContentsNext section

________________________________________________________________________

U.S. Code Provisions: Railroads

Comments (0)add comment

Post a comment or question below.
smaller | bigger

busy
 
Email  Email Print  Print   Digg

Bobby W. Davis Attorney At Law

303 34th Street, Suite 8
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451
Practice Areas: Family Law, Personal Injury, Divorce
virginiabeachattorney.lawoffice.com/
Mary G. Commander Attorney-At-Law
Norfolk Divorce and Family Law Attorney

5442 Tidewater Drive
Norfolk, Virginia 23509
Practice Areas: Family Law, Personal Injury, Divorce
www.commanderlaw.com/
David M. McCormick
Newport News Family Law and Bankruptcy Attorney

One Oyster Point 827 Diligence Drive, Suite 200
Newport News, Virginia 23606
Practice Areas: Family Law, Divorce
www.dmmlegal.com/
monotone-frail